Integrated care heightens provider monopolies risk

Posted on April 17, 2009. Filed under: Integrated care, Journals |

Health Service Journal | By Helen Crump | 19 June 2008

Primary care trusts will need to hold powerful monopoly providers to account if Lord Darzi gives integrated care systems the go-ahead.

Experts are predicting that under integrated care models, large amounts of money are likely to be consolidated in the hands of new groups straddling primary, community, social and even hospital care.

As HSJ revealed last week, a pilot of integrated care schemes is strongly tipped to feature in the Darzi review, due out at the end of the month.

And in a report published today, Altogether Now? Policy options for integrating care, which explores different urgent care models open to the NHS, Birmingham University’s health services management centre states the Darzi strategy is likely to feature new models emphasising “a more effective integration of primary and secondary care”.

Report co-author Chris Ham said: “There are a lot of people from different positions saying what we’re trying to argue in the paper. The big risk is that if the government does nothing, we’ll end up with continuing and probably increasing fragmentation.”

He said the potential benefit was that patients would receive “properly co-ordinated” care and that some problems caused by the divide between GPs, hospitals and social care would be avoided. But he added the risk was that patients would have to get their care from integrated care organisations which had become “slow-moving monopoly providers”. He said: “It’s important that patients should still be able to exercise choice.”

PCT Network director David Stout said strategic commissioning at PCT level would be needed to hold integrated organisations to account. He added commissioners would need to be very good “because you’re setting up a powerful monopoly provider – you would have to have the skills and incentives to get this system to work properly”.

Innovations in integration: proposed models

Integrated health and social care commissioning:

  • Health and social care foundation trusts
  • Integrated health and social care teams
  • Individual patient budgets for long-term conditions – as proposed in several strategic health authority Darzi vision documents

    Primary healthcare integration:

    • Integrated commissioner and provider organisations
    • Integrated provider functions based on practice-based commissioning
    • Creating a primary care market with multiple integrated organisations delivering various aspects of care, such as disease-specific organisations.

      Primary and secondary care integration:

      • Practice-based commissioning consortia taking responsibility for entire health service budgets for their populations
      • Stronger relationships between primary, community and specialist providers as an interim measure
        Advertisements

        Make a Comment

        Leave a Reply

        Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

        WordPress.com Logo

        You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

        Twitter picture

        You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

        Facebook photo

        You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

        Google+ photo

        You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

        Connecting to %s

        One Response to “Integrated care heightens provider monopolies risk”

        RSS Feed for Alternative Providers of Primary Care Comments RSS Feed

        […] Integrated care heightens provider monopolies risk Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)Integrated careChoice and competition in primary care: Much ado about nothing?Integrated care organisations and their vital PBC role15 Minutes… […]


        Where's The Comment Form?

        Liked it here?
        Why not try sites on the blogroll...

        %d bloggers like this: